E-Portfolios and Jumping Through Hoops 

“I Just Did it to Get it Done" -- The Transformation of Intentions in Portfolio Assessment in Teacher Education

This paper is already three years old, and although it sounds very narrow in its scope, it's worth looking at if you're at all interested in any type of assigned reflection (blogging, e-portfolios, learning journals) for students of any age. If you read the students' feedback on pages 10-14, you'll probably skip back and read most of the rest.

I thought that four themes emerged. One is the conflict between documenting change, mistakes, struggles (often essential parts of learning) and focusing on presenting competencies, confidence and completed learning outcomes. This is acknowledged in the process vs. product debate, but extends it further into discussion of how to present an online identity.

The paper also delves into the politics of portfolios in teacher education, touching on the issue of using portfolios for high-stakes assessment:

"The purpose of the portfolio was thus transformed from the individualistic, developmental, constructivist vision in the Design Document to a policy tool designed to address external program and state requirements."
...and "When people in power (i.e., the state, a teacher education faculty) impose a cultural tool, less powerful agents (preservice teachers) may master the tool but use it with reluctance or in subversive ways, or resist its use altogether."

It covers important issues surrounding faculty disengagement, lack of professional development, assessment difficulties, and uneven implementation, but the key point is revealed in the title of the paper: most of the students are jumping through hoops:

"Most said they produced these portfolios just to 'get them done,' because the program required them – not because they found them personally meaningful."

If most students aren't internalizing the process (or product?), they aren't experiencing many of the benefits of reflective learning. This would apply to assigned blogging and e-portfolios, and almost any type of assignment for that matter. Without engagement, the result of the process is a set of artifacts and writing that the student doesn't identify with. When the authors asked one whether she thought her portfolio represented her, she responded:

"No, no, I don’t think so. It’s accurate in what I’ve done, but not in, I
don’t know, in who I am, I guess, maybe, um, I don’t know, the whole experience was just so, I don’t know, it’s like this big, dark cloud hanging over it."

Lots of other issues in there as well, all important if we're planning to build and implement something that is actually useful and meaningful. Via David Tosh and Michelle Lamberson.

Permanent Link  |  Home  |  

Welcome to Jeremy Hiebert's instructional design and technology blog. Feel free to comment on postings, or e-mail me. Check out my personal/family blog at your own risk.


More about me...

Archives

Home
May 2003  
June 2003  
July 2003  
August 2003  
September 2003  
October 2003  
November 2003  
December 2003  
January 2004  
February 2004  
March 2004  
April 2004  
May 2004  
June 2004  
July 2004  
August 2004  
September 2004  
October 2004  
November 2004  
December 2004  
January 2005  
February 2005  
March 2005  
April 2005  
May 2005  
June 2005  
July 2005  
August 2005  
September 2005  
October 2005  
November 2005  
December 2005  
January 2006  
February 2006  
March 2006  
April 2006  
May 2006  
June 2006  
July 2006  
August 2006  
September 2006  
October 2006  
November 2006  
December 2006  
January 2007  
February 2007  
March 2007  
April 2007  
May 2007  
June 2007  
July 2007  
June 2008